A perfect example of liberal media bias

If you look at the screen capture above, you will see a perfect example of the liberal media bias that is so incredibly pervasive and disgusting here in Los Angeles County.

The supposed "news" website Burbank n' Beyond does all types of coverage of fuzzy warm stories... high school football scores, and "Press Release" journalism. A wonderful gift of free publicity for official Democratic apparatchiks Congressman Adam Schiff and Assemblyman Mike Gatto.

No opposing opinions or viewpoints will be allowed!

If you go to their website and search for my name... like I did yesterday... you will find no hits.

No results. Nothing.

The Republican Nominee for Congress is invisible and does not exist.

One week before a National Election, and there will be no mention of opposing forces to the Politburo.

Nothing to see here, folks!

The media here in the Los Angeles area is so incredibly perverted and twisted when it comes to politics, that any random pedestrian who got hit by a car would get more coverage in the media than a Republican running for Congress in a liberal-dominated county.

I only want 3 things from Barack Obama....

I only want 3 things from Barack Obama....

1) I want him defeated in the election by a large popular vote and electoral count. Something beyond the possible scope of Democratic voter fraud.

2) I want him out of the White House by January 20th without doing all types of petty, nasty, destructive things on his way out of town.

3) I never want to hear about him again.

My ballot selections for November 6th

PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT -- MITT ROMNEY, PAUL RYAN

I have been pretty clear on my blog about not being a big fan of Mitt Romney. He was my last possible choice in the Republican primaries and I think he is the most politically moderate and Big Government Republican we could run in this election.

Having said that, I'll be voting for Romney for 3 reasons: Israel, Iran and The Supreme Court. Barack Obama has clearly shown through his actions that he can't be trusted with leading America when it comes to these three crucial issues.

Hopefully, Romney will surprise me and become a great leader, but due to his Big Government track record, I won't hold my breath.

I'm actually happy to support a fellow Wisconsin native for Vice President. Paul Ryan has a good Conservative soul, and his heart is in the right place, but a decade in Washington has co-opted him to the dark side and he has cast some Big Government votes that I find horrific. Hopefully, he will also grow into his role and do an excellent job.

U.S. SENATE -- ELIZABETH EMKEN

I said in a previous blog post that I didn't support Elizabeth Emken in 2012. I still don't. I think she is a Big Government RINO. But when the option is between her or Feinstein, I suppose it doesn't hurt to throw her a sympathy vote. She is going to get killed by Feinstein...maybe 70-30... because most voters don't know who Emken is and can't identify what goals she is trying to accomplish.

U.S. REPRESENTATIVE -- PHIL JENNERJAHN

It goes without saying that I'll be voting for myself to become the next Congressman from this area. My debate with Adam Schiff exposed him as a Big Government liberal who supports abortion, gay marriage, illegal immigration and trillions in deficit spending. I can't understand why anyone would vote for him. But I'm sure the voters of the 28th District have their own opinions....

STATE ASSEMBLY (50TH DISTRICT) -- RICHARD BLOOM

Wow. Do I ever hate voting for a liberal! But my selection in this race is the lesser (I hope!) of two evils. The other choice, Assembly Member Betsy Butler, has been bombarding voters with mailers telling everyone that she is some type of spiritual combination of Che Guevara and Cesar Chavez. Butler sent me over the edge when she mailed me this nutty flier. I mean...for God's sake...look at that photo! Who is she trying to be ? Sacajawea or Jesus of Nazareth? I can't stand Butler. I hope Bloom will be less destructive...but somehow, I doubt it.

DISTRICT ATTORNEY -- ALAN JACKSON

I originally supported Carmen "Nuch" Trutanich in this election, and I'd be supporting him again here if his campaign manager hadn't bungled the operation so badly. Loyalty is important to me and I don't throw my friends under the bus just because they said or did something that wasn't popular. However, the choice here is between Jackson and Jackie Lacey. Republican groups seem to like Jackson better. I do not know much about Jackson, but I am trusting the judgement of other people who know him better than I do.

STATE MEASURES

30 - NO  -- I don't like any wording of "temporary" with regard to taxes. The State usually finds a way to spend whatever it desires. And it has never been "about the kids" or education.

31 - NO -- Giving more local control over tax funds to people like The Dark Lord and The Cat Whisperer? No thanks.

32 - YES -- Smash the union right to strip payroll money for their slush funds? Ok. I like that.

33 - NO -- It sounds like a good idea, but it is actually cleverly written nonsense from the insurance companies so that they can charge you more. Education measures are never about the kids. And Business measures are never about saving you money.

34 - NO -- Death Penalty Repeal? Nope. No thanks. And our degenerate Mayor Villaraigosa signed the rebuttal to the argument against 34. Tells me all I need to know right there.

35 - NO -- This is an overwhelmingly liberal idea to stop the evil of human trafficking, but it goes too far by including people who are only tangentially related to the crime. Nice idea, but with no accountability or oversight, we can do without it.

36 - NO -- The "Three Strikes" law might be harsh and occasionally be a severe punishment for a minor crime, but it has also kept crime rates very low...even in a bad economy. I see no reason to change or adapt it.

37 - NO -- Food safety. Yeah. It's never about food safety. Liberal meddling and lawsuit hunting.

38 - NO -- It's never about the kids. We spend billions on schools here and get crappy results.

39 - NO -- "Green Energy" proposals do two things. They kill jobs and send businesses fleeing.

COUNTY MEASURE A -- NO

COUNTY MEASURE B -- NO

COUNTY MEASURE J -- NO

My views on: Obamacare

I want to make very clear to potential voters what my views are about Obamacare.

If elected to Congress on November 6th, I will do everything within my power to destroy Obamacare, because the concept is both illegal and immoral.

I believe in the sanctity of the Tenth Amendment, which limits Federal power over the States. I believe the government routinely violates our Constitution and our rights by attempting to do far too much in order to placate restless citizens.

Giving the Government the right to seize the entire health care industry and to dictate terms and prices and procedures is an act of lunacy that was only made possible through Democratic bribery and extortion. Senators Ben Nelson of Nebraska and Mary Landrieu of Louisiana accepted bribes offered by fellow legislators to change their votes and pass the Obamacare bill. I mentioned in my debate with Adam Schiff that some of these people need to see the inside of a jail cell if our government is ever going to function correctly.

If Obamacare was so wonderful, why did 800 different organizations that support Obama need a waiver from it? Allowing the law to apply to some, but not to others is a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which says that laws must equally apply to all citizens. Therefore, Obamacare violates our Constitution and is illegal.

Obama, under the guise of "providing health services" recently dictated to Catholic hospitals that they had to provide abortion drugs to patients. This violates several tenets of the Catholic faith and is something they can never do. Eventually Obama backed off of this demand when several Catholic institutions, including the University of Notre Dame, started suing his Administration. At the same time Obama was trampling on the religious freedom of Catholics, he was completely exempting his precious buddies the Muslims from participating in Obamacare, because health insurance is a form of gambling, which is not allowed in Islam. Therefore, because Obama will use force against one religious faith while completely exempting another faith from his wrath, Obamacare is immoral.

I will finish my argument today with one very specific statement concerning my opposition to Obamacare:

Giving the Government more control over your health care is giving the Government more control over you.

Think about that.

I often criticize Obama by calling him "Caesar" or "Pharaoh" because of his fondness for breaking our laws and violating our Constitution and its protections from tyranny.

But as bad as Obama is... what if someone comes along that is worse?

What if 20 years from now we have a leader who makes Obama look like a meter maid?

What if this new, crazed leader issues a decree that all citizens who donated financially to the political opposition in the past will now no longer receive medical treatment?

This is why you don't leave the health care industry under government control. You cannot afford to mistakenly assume that all future leaders will be kind-natured angels.

History has proven repeatedly that this is not the case.

My views on: Americas Biggest Threat

The biggest threat right now to America isn't Barack Obama. And it isn't the Russians, the Chinese , or the Muslims, either.

The single biggest threat to America right now....beyond any foreign army or terrorist, is the collapse of our currency caused by the awful economic policies of our government. Our leaders have, in effect, created a "Ponzi Scheme" Government.

Our national debt is impossible to pay off. Even if the government seized every penny of currency in the world, there still wouldn't be enough money to pay it off. But the national debt is a bit misleading, because a huge chunk of it is money we owe to ourselves. 

How do you pay yourself back? 

When you have been spending money you don't have, and cranking up the printing presses to produce fiat currency...money backed up by nothing but air....you jeopardize your entire economy and your countries financial future. Usually this leads to a devaluation of your currency and difficult economic times. That additional money gets into the flow of commerce and causes prices to rise.

It isn't so much the cost of gasoline that is going up, as it is the value of a dollar that is going down.

Back when we were on a gold or silver standard, our money had real value.... But now with these irresponsible economic policies, our money and our value are disappearing before our very eyes.

The problem all started in 1971 when President Richard Nixon took our country off the Gold Standard. Prior to 1971, one U.S. dollar was the equivalent of $1 of gold held in the reserves of the United States Treasury...much of it at Fort Knox, Kentucky. 

Now, we have what is known as a "fiat currency" that holds value only because our government says it does. The basic problem with this is that investors can lose faith in a government and cause the value of their money to collapse. This often happens with stunning speed.

Quantitative Easing is a recipe for financial collapse and our government needs to stop doing it. It is a reckless policy that cheats people out of value across the globe.

Barack Obama is the biggest thief in human history. His policies have eroded so much value from our money, that the hundreds of millions of Americans -- and indeed, the billions of the people around the world who depend on US currency for their medium of exchange -- have lost trillions of dollars of wealth just based on the decline of our moneys value.

A writer on the internet pointed out the other day that our government will never go broke. They can simply print up more money, he said. That's true, but that printing will destroy the value of all the dollars currently in existence. Someday soon you might be paying $25 for an In 'N Out cheeseburger. Or $100 for a Dominos pizza.

Sure, you will make more money than ever, but your pay most likely won't keep up with the staggering inflation that "Quantitative Easing" will likely produce. We have all heard stories of the Weimar Republic in Germany, where people had to bring a wheelbarrow full of money to the store to purchase a loaf of bread.

Things are not that bad here in America...yet.

But we are headed in that direction.

We need to elect leaders who understand economics and the dangers of a money-printing policy that eventually harms everyone.

Romney looking, acting, and sounding Presidential

This video is big trouble for the Obama campaign.

This is Mitt Romney looking, acting, and sounding Presidential.

Romney is starting to feel it. He knows he is closing in on the White House.

Florida is gone for Obama, so is North Carolina.

Obama is desperately trying to hang on in Ohio, Nevada, Iowa and Wisconsin.

Romney might win them all.

My views on : Libya

Due to the fact that I probably will not get to debate Adam Schiff again before the Nov. 6th election, I am going to release a series of opinion papers to help communicate my views to the voters of the 28th Congressional District. This series, entitled "My views on..." will continue until the election and cover a very wide and diverse range of subjects. 

***************

LIBYA


When discussing Libya with the voters, there are several different areas that need to be discussed. Most recently, the discussions concerning Libya have been primarily focusing on the death of our Ambassador and his staff.

While the deaths of the Ambassador and his staff were heinous and inexcusable, it remains a sad commentary on the state of diplomacy that when you have diplomats serving in a troubled area where revolutions or wars are going on, that they will constantly remain in potential danger and can consistently be viewed as potential targets by opposing forces in that area.

Conservatives on Facebook and Twitter are eager to bash Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton and do some finger-pointing and scandal-accusing due to these tragic deaths. I myself, on the other hand, am not so quick to blame anyone in particular. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton have to oversee hundreds of Embassies around the world, and it is impossible for any one human to keep track of them all simultaneously. This is why there is a chain of command, and certain duties are delegated to various staff members further on down the line.

Now, it may be that the staff there in Libya requested additional security. Maybe they didn't. Maybe they misjudged or underestimated the aggression by local forces towards their compound. It is difficult to say what exactly happened there without having more facts, but we do know the outcome of that nights events. And it wasn't good for America.

However, most Americans would be surprised to learn that the Muslims in Libya have been causing trouble for America for over 200 years!

Yes, you read that right. This is where the Ron Paul supporters go horribly awry when they believe that America causes all it's own problems by meddling in international affairs. We didn't have any military bases in anyones countries, yet the Muslims were gladly participating in open thievery against us, by committing pirate attacks on our commercial shipping.The Muslims in Libya attacked and seized their first American naval vessel in 1784 when our young country was only 8 years old!! 

The Barbary Pirates (as they were called then) not only robbed and stole from people, they attacked other nations and enslaved their populations. The Muslims in Libya were responsible for over 1 million Europeans being sold into slavery.

Thomas Jefferson tried to negotiate some type of peaceful passage for our commercial fleet, but ended up being threatened into paying extortion money by the Muslims. Jefferson eventually got sick of being extorted, and used Americas wealth to build the U.S. Navy and the Marine Corps.

Our American military eventually retaliated against the Muslims by bombarding Tripoli with cannonballs until the Muslims decided to stop attacking American ships.

To this day, the official Marine Corps song talks about "From the halls of Montezuma...to the shores of Tripoli" because it was their first great victory over a foreign power.

So basically, Muslims in Libya have been causing us trouble for over 200 years, most of it due to the inherent immorality of their peculiar religion. But that is another subject for another day.

Another issue, as to whether or not we should have intervened militarily by bombing Libya in 2011, that is a separate question.

Peaceniks, hippies and Libertarians always hate war and don't want America involved militarily anywhere at anytime. Their position is ludicrous and denies the basic existence of evil in this world.

Moammar Ghaddafi was an evil man. Anyone who uses military force against their own civilian population usually is on the verge of losing power because they have lost their moral authority to lead.

Happy citizens don't try to kill their leaders.

I am not opposed to quick, short-term military interventions like this. When we as Americans help stop a mad dictator from killing his own people, it only increases our moral authority in this world by showing everyone else that we lead by example.

Our actions usually help destroy the last shred of dignity or legitimacy that a fallen leader will ever have.

Critics argue that we might have inadvertently helped the Muslim Brotherhood to seize control in Libya.

That might be a fact, but it also might be false. It is possible that fanatical Muslims would have gained power and control in Libya even without our help. Some of this is due to a very basic difference in the belief system and values that Muslims have compared to people in other parts of the world.

The problems in Libya are just one part of a bigger complex of issues across the Middle East.

Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq...it's all the same thing, really.

It's all just part of the larger war against Muslims, just in different neighborhoods.